Your level
0/5
🏆
Listen to this genre to level up
Description

Experimental electronic is an umbrella term for electronic music that foregrounds exploration and innovation over convention. It treats the studio, computer, and synthesizer as laboratories, using techniques such as tape manipulation, modular and software synthesis, feedback systems, granular and spectral processing, algorithmic/generative composition, circuit-bending, and field recording.

Rather than regular song forms or dancefloor functionality, it prioritizes timbre, texture, space, and process. Structures may be nonlinear or open-form; harmony is often non-functional or drone-based; rhythm can be free, irregular, or machine-deconstructed. The style overlaps with electroacoustic music, sound art, industrial, ambient, and noise while continually interfacing with club culture and contemporary art contexts.

History
Origins (1940s–1960s)

Experimental electronic grows from mid‑20th‑century studio practices where sound itself became a primary material. In France, Pierre Schaeffer’s musique concrète at GRM and Pierre Henry’s tape works reframed recorded sound as a sculptable object. In Germany, WDR Cologne fostered elektronische Musik under Herbert Eimert and Karlheinz Stockhausen. Parallel efforts at the BBC Radiophonic Workshop (Daphne Oram, Delia Derbyshire), Columbia‑Princeton (Vladimir Ussachevsky, Milton Babbitt), and the San Francisco Tape Music Center (Pauline Oliveros, Morton Subotnick) expanded both technique and aesthetics.

Studio and Synth Revolution (1960s–1970s)

The advent of Moog and Buchla synthesizers and multi‑track tape catalyzed new timbres and forms. Morton Subotnick’s “Silver Apples of the Moon” (1967) showcased Buchla’s possibilities; Eliane Radigue refined long‑form analog‑drone minimalism; Iannis Xenakis introduced stochastic and UPIC‑based approaches. Institutions like IRCAM, EMS Stockholm, CCRMA, and countless university studios incubated computer music, spatialization, and early digital synthesis.

Industrial, DIY, and Cross‑Pollination (late 1970s–1980s)

DIY cassette networks and an anti‑establishment ethos birthed industrial and post‑industrial experiments (Throbbing Gristle, Cabaret Voltaire, Nurse With Wound). Ambient’s emergence (Brian Eno) and Berlin School sequencing intersected with experimental methods, while engineers and artists pushed tape abuse, feedback, and hacked electronics alongside performance art and gallery installations.

Digital Turn and Laptop Era (1990s–2000s)

Affordable computers and software (Max/MSP, SuperCollider, Reaktor) enabled granular, spectral, and algorithmic workflows. Labels and scenes (Mego, Raster‑Noton, Mille Plateaux, 12k) fostered glitch, microsound, and digital minimalism (Oval, Fennesz, Alva Noto). IDM figures (Aphex Twin, Autechre) bridged experimental sound design with rhythmic complexity, influencing club and art contexts alike.

2010s–Present

A modular synth renaissance, live coding/algorave, and deconstructed club aesthetics widened the field (Arca, Holly Herndon, Oneohtrix Point Never, Tim Hecker). Multichannel/immersive audio, ambisonics, and AI/ML tools expanded spatial and procedural possibilities. Today, experimental electronic thrives across galleries, festivals, academia, and DIY venues, continuously reshaping how electronic sound can be made and heard.

How to make a track in this genre
Materials and Setup
•   Define a conceptual frame (process, constraint, or sound-world) rather than a genre template. •   Gather sources: field recordings, found objects, modular/synth patches, feedback chains, or raw waveforms/noise. •   Choose tools that invite exploration: modular/Buchla/Eurorack, Max/MSP, SuperCollider, Reaktor, Pure Data, Kyma, or DAW with granular/spectral plug‑ins.
Sound Design and Processing
•   Explore synthesis beyond subtractive: FM, wavetable, physical modeling, additive, spectral resynthesis, and granular. •   Abuse the signal path creatively: tape saturation/drag, bit reduction, sample‑rate shifts, convolution with unconventional IRs, comb filters, ring mod, and feedback networks. •   Use micro-editing and stochastic or algorithmic modulation to evolve textures over time.
Structure, Rhythm, and Harmony
•   Favor process‑driven or open forms. Let a transformation (e.g., progressive filtering or density shifts) define structure. •   Treat rhythm as texture: asynchronous loops, polymeter, irregular accents, or free‑time pulses. Silence and negative space are compositional tools. •   Eschew functional harmony for drones, modal centers, microtonality, or timbre‑based ‘harmonies’ derived from spectra and overtone stacks.
Space and Presentation
•   Compose for space as an instrument: multichannel diffusion, ambisonics, binaural, or site‑specific speaker placement. •   Use reverb/delay and filtering to sculpt perceived depth and foreground/background relationships.
Performance and Notation
•   Improvise with live electronics, controllers, modular, or live coding; map gestures to parameters for expressive control. •   Consider graphic scores, timelines, or code/patches as the ‘notation.’ Record multiple takes and curate emergent results.
Production and Aesthetics
•   Preserve dynamic range; let quiet details coexist with sudden contrasts. Avoid over‑compression unless it’s conceptually justified. •   Embrace artifacts (glitches, hum, mechanical noises) as musical material when they serve the concept. •   Document the process and iterate; the experiment itself can be the piece.
Influenced by
Has influenced
No genres found
Š 2025 Melodigging
Melodding was created as a tribute to Every Noise at Once, which inspired us to help curious minds keep digging into music's ever-evolving genres.